The indian cams court stated that “our understanding was to provide time for you to the Lt. Governor to choose. Should you had told us that we can’t take decision, we could have heard the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) petition and decided the matter either way”. “With greatest respect at our command we feel the government need to have taken the choice earlier. All of us realize that the matter is pending ahead of the court and time has been offered to make a decision.” (With agency inputs)

Speaking about her meeting with Modi prior to resigning as Kerala Governor, Dikshit mentioned, “I saw a confident man, using a vision when I went to meet him, but a big ??but’ is how all this indian live sex could be virtually implemented. He began with ??achhe din aayenge’. Now that has totally dropped from his vocabulary. His coinage of new phrases is attractive because it is distinct. But how far is it practically achieveable, a very massive query mark hangs more than that.” Asked whether the Congress necessary to take its cue right from Modi’s manner of functioning, she mentioned, “Whether we ought to draw at his style or methodology is one thing we ought to wait and assess. It truly is too early to attempt and do anything like he does. He’s speaking and promising a lot of things and has a new language, but we ought to see what will occur eventually on his promises.”

Stating that it had “absolutely no intention” of withholding such information, the government said it, nevertheless, wanted “certain clarification” to allow it to enter into and further honour its agreements with other countries. While the Supreme Court, in its 2011 order, had directed comprehensive disclosure of info on those who have black income abroad, the indian cam government nowadays made it clear that it was open to disclosing information received under tax treaties only “after following the due method of law, in all cases where evasion of tax is established.” It said details would grow to be public only soon after “investigations are total plus a complaint/ prosecution is filed within a competent court.” Additional, the government mentioned no names could be disclosed even inside a proceeding instituted by way of a PIL “unless there’s prima facie proof of wrongdoing”.